Saturday, February 19, 2011

The Fence Rider

I'm going to attempt to either convince myself I'm wrong, or convince myself I'm right. Anyone who knows me realizes I like to waver and straddle the fence on most issues. Perhaps I'm a gutless pig. Maybe I am a man of no convictions. One thing I do know is that I generally see both sides in most arguments. This wasn't always the case, as my side usually won on most issues, regardless if I was wrong. I want to be wrong, rather than right. And with this as my into, let's jump into Senate Bill 5!

In brief, Ohio Governor Kasich (I voted for the guy, so I know full and well what I was getting myself into!) and the Republican side (?) of the Senate is pushing a bill to eliminate collective bargaining across the board for its police, fireman, teachers and other employees. As a "union" busting bill, it's supporters are hoping to bargain with the teachers (and others) on budget, health care and wages without having to bow down to salary demands from the union. There's other issues at stake here as well. The bill also wants to eliminate step increases and salary schedule by imposing pay based on merit (more on this later), proposing workers to pay up to 20 percent of their (our) health costs and for teachers, eliminating class size proposals too (more on that later).

Now with everything happening in Wisconsin, it's becoming apparent that both the teachers and the politicians are not going to budge. Schools are closed with teachers claiming that today's kids will learn that somethings need to be fought for (when they are probably getting in their X-Box games in large volumes) and the Democratic senators leaving the state so they wont have to vote on the bill. And here I am again at a crossroads. How does not teaching prove your worth and how is running from the fight into another state going to help prove your side?

I hope this doesn't happen in Ohio. Some of it is. Some of my colleagues have taken a day off last Thursday to march and speak alongside the numerous other state employees. No one seems to be willing to budge, and perhaps this is part of the problem. Our governor fired the first salvo by saying he would punish striking workers. Our side fired back, and have been pretty much on the defensive end all year. In fact, our union prints a newsletter once a week, and anyone can find at least one instance of the language we use to supposedly work together into condescending diatribes. Every school's business is there to see? How is reporting a grievance of another school's principal relevant to how I'm going to do my job better? They want me to vote a certain way and will sometimes editorialize their feelings about our district. Hey, we all do at times, but the conversations in my teachers' lounge are not printed for consumption (and I'm beginning to feel I need to just stay in my own room for lunch lately).

Now, much of this union busting business is stemmed from state's budgets that have been spiraling out of control for some time. I don't expect the government to figure out the states' spending in a logical manner considering myself and millions of other Americans have thousands of dollars of debt of their own. But when your finances are a mess, you make the cuts that are necessary. On a personal note, you try to cut out the frivolous things and focus on the necessities. This means less movies and dinners out and more on groceries. Simple. Now states don't necessarily think this way. Many are unwilling to cut personal projects and earmarks and are looking to bite into the unions of the state as part of their means. Healthcare spending is high too. I'm not an expert on states' budgets, and if I were I wouldn't be a teacher considering I would need to invest more time in that instead of my own lesson plans.

So old union agreements such as pensions were promised when the economy was fruitful. Now that every state is feeling the fiscal pinch, something must be cut. Do I agree that it should be the pensions of our cops, firemen and teachers? And maybe it isn't exactly the pensions but the step increases that are already in place and are exponentially larger each year. Our healthcare is going up and the state wants us to pay more of our costs. Why couldn't this be negotiated on bit sides before rallies had to be made and tempers flared? Seems silly.

Now, teachers and unions are also projected as a protector of a bunch of lazy workers. Negative stories of bad behavior and tales of "rubber rooms" paint the profession in a negative light. I cannot speak for teachers nationally or what their union fights for or not, but I do know that there is something wrong and broken with the current state of education. There's a tremendous amount of waste in the school system (much on the end of the administrators as well). Do you want to know how many teachers teach from the back of their desks? Do you really want to see the work packets that are printed out and how much seat work really goes on? If it happens at one school, imagine it multiplied throughout and entire district, a state, a nation.

Does the union protect these teachers? To a certain degree. Worse is that we protect our own. We see the ones we want to work with, the teammates who you would have your own kids being taught by. We see them yelling in the halls and we say nothing. We see them take almost every Friday off while the rest of us are working. We hear them complain in the lounge and realize that seniority is the only thing keeping them employed.

I'm ready for a merit-based pay scale. I welcome it. I don't want to lose my job to someone who has had more years which makes them better. I am aware of the ramifications. First, there is no rigid, proven way to evaluate my worth as a teacher. It's almost like parenting. Is there a test that proves I'm raising my son right? Will a test score prove my worth or the worth of that parent who makes sure their child is doing their homework instead of being on facebook. Batelle has come up with a convoluted method called "value-added" and if you can understand their charts and graphs and measurements, it shows a child's progress. Will that be the key to unlocking a merit-based system? Will it be like the NCAA BCS super computer calculations? Like, will the # of office referrals, test scores, days absent, degree earned and # of students in my classrooms create a score that ranks me in my building? Maybe I should be against Senate Bill 5 on those reasons alone, but why isn't my union doing more to base pay and layoffs on merit rather than years? This doesn't even take into account the cops, nurses and firemen!

As a taxpayer myself, I'm also feeling the pinch. My daughter's school keeps raising the prices of sports and is cutting teachers and services district-wide because of failed levies and budget constraints. A no vote is somehow anti-schools and a yes-vote means I just voted for the next tax increase to come. Where is the end? I would pay for more cops and firemen and health care. Why can't I just come to the table, without striking, without fear of being fired and work these things out? The suits on both sides are to blame. If the schools are this bad, why are the suits still holding their jobs?

I don't see the bill passing regardless if I rally or change my profile on facebook to show my allegiance to my union. It is though, a sign of things to come. What do I want to do? I just want to teach.

Friday, February 11, 2011

Anthem of Love

I recently read a post on Facebook about the separation of church and state argument. It detailed how an organized group of kids can meet and pray and live faithfully, just so long as it is not endorsed by the administration, district, and therefore, not a teacher either (not sure about the last one in terms of off-site. The young life volunteers and mentors at my daughter's high school sometimes work within the school district as coaches and teachers).

I've been mulling over the many times God shows up in my school day. While I don't "teach" theology, I do teach and enforce the morals of respect, support and family. That's Jesus right there. While I don't openly pray with my students, I pray for many of them. And while I don't lead a class into the aspects of sin and Jesus' grace, I do work on showing forgiveness and giving an equal share.

Recently, we've had two school assemblies featuring speakers for Black History Month. Having been doing more and more research about the history of slavery and some of its most notable faces, I've come to understand that there really isn't a way to discuss slavery and the civil rights' movement without mentioning the faith of many of its people.

Now, I know this can go both ways. some can argue that the Kingdom-Over "faith" of Christianity and more than likely Catholicism, was one of the main roots of the evils of slavery. Besides winning land for the crown, giving faith to the Natives of the new land was another top priority. Now, if it had to be forced, the more the merrier. I also understand this highly complex relationship, but knowing this allows me to know that love and grace wins more than brute force. We can learn from those mistakes as well. Should we forget? Of course not, but what can a teacher in central Ohio do to alleviate the sins of the past?

Back to the speakers. One of them was a characterization of Sojourner Truth. Among the retelling of her history of being a child born into bondage and being sold from her family at 9, told of how singing "Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star," became an anthem of her love with God. I'm looking around for my principle who is probably ready to pull the woman off the stage like she's at the Apollo Theater Amateur Night. Then the speaker goes into singing, "Jesus Loves Me," and I'm in the back, smiling as ever at the situation. I teach in an age where you can't offend anyone or speak of anything Christian, but I'm in an all-school assembly singing "Jesus Loves Me."

A Week later, we have another speaker, a radio personality and ex-body builder who spoke to the kids about a healthy lifestyle and staying positive. He ends the lesson by saying, "Put God First" and had the kids repeat it. Awesome! God isn't separated from schools. He's knee deep in them. The only thing that's close to being separated is that the schools cannot endorse any one religion (maybe you're thinking we did with the speakers we chose).

So, I go back to the novels I've read and the references to God. Shilo. Day of Tears. Sounder. Because of Winn Dixie. Stone Fox. Maniac Magee. The list is an awesome sign of the writers who wrote with their experiences and sometimes, their faith (I can only assume, but in each case it's dealt with respect and reverence). And if I'm getting into this topic full bore, how can we truly understand the people we are expected to learn about without mentioning the faith of these people? This also means we talk openly about Ghandi's and Malcolm X as well as Martin Luther King Jr.'s. Can I expect my kids to understand the abolitionist movement without first understanding that many of the first were religious men? The history books make short thrift, in my opinion. Does it mean that my own education should be as well?

I'm chapter 6 into Day of Tears, about the real-life slave auction of the Pierce Butler plantation slaves. My theme of the story is to make the kids realize how slavery was not only deplorable and a horror beyond belief, but that it was a systematic breaking of a man's spirit. I spend the time to re-read sections of the story when slaves brokered for their own lives and to keep the masters from selling their families, and end up sounding live slave auctioneers in the process. The kids of today have no understanding of this. They only know talking back, respect and personal space. Will today's black youth ever understand that feeling of worthlessness? I'm going to keep asking them and emphasizing and teaching. It's the best that I can do.